From ... From: Erik Naggum Subject: Re: Question on converting string to symbol Date: 2000/06/23 Message-ID: <3170710113433739@naggum.no>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 637868450 References: <3951ffbd.5075351@news.worldonline.nl> <3h14lskka927a38hechgqslur05b0g31kb@4ax.com> <3952A8F3.11C75C76@pacbell.net> mail-copies-to: never Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Complaints-To: newsmaster@eunet.no X-Trace: oslo-nntp.eunet.no 961724267 981 195.0.192.66 (23 Jun 2000 01:37:47 GMT) Organization: Naggum Software; vox: +47 8800 8879; fax: +47 8800 8601; http://www.naggum.no User-Agent: Gnus/5.0803 (Gnus v5.8.3) Emacs/20.6 Mime-Version: 1.0 NNTP-Posting-Date: 23 Jun 2000 01:37:47 GMT Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp * "Steven M. Haflich" | You should consider make-symbol as well, depending on whether you | want the symbol interned. All these silly Lisp gurus apparently | miss something in their internalization of CL language abstractions: | a symbol is a first-class object separate from its internment in | packages. (:-) Nah, that's the difference between unintern and unimport. #:Erik -- If this is not what you expected, please alter your expectations.