From ... From: Erik Naggum Subject: Re: `letf' in Common Lisp? Date: 2000/06/14 Message-ID: <3170001575319347@naggum.no>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 634592757 References: <3168928070841171@naggum.no> <3169102484898761@naggum.no> <3169720630871403@naggum.no> <3169797928935247@naggum.no> <3169841934681062@naggum.no> <8zwa8jj1.fsf@alum.mit.edu> <39479B13.9C8CA93E@franz.com> <3947DF15.3AFF@synquiry.com> mail-copies-to: never Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Complaints-To: newsmaster@eunet.no X-Trace: oslo-nntp.eunet.no 961013363 8614 195.0.192.66 (14 Jun 2000 20:09:23 GMT) Organization: Naggum Software; vox: +47 8800 8879; fax: +47 8800 8601; http://www.naggum.no User-Agent: Gnus/5.0803 (Gnus v5.8.3) Emacs/20.6 Mime-Version: 1.0 NNTP-Posting-Date: 14 Jun 2000 20:09:23 GMT Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp * Jon S Anthony | Could you point out where in the standard it indicates that an | implementation may ignore a free type declaration if it obeys a | bound one? This is a completely bogus question. Pull yourself together and _think_ carefully about what you request from the standard, and to what level of redundant detail it had to go if it were able to answer your question. #:Erik, sighing -- If this is not what you expected, please alter your expectations.