From ... From: Erik Naggum Subject: Re: What Lisp to choose? Date: 2000/06/07 Message-ID: <3169356872676933@naggum.no>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 632093569 References: <39256F8E.EAB3FD45@altavista.net> <87wvkgy25y.fsf@quadium.net> <8gompj$1hc$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <87vgzw2nuk.fsf@frown.inka.de> <8h2q2a$1qcn$1@counter.bik-gmbh.de> <393BE542.625E7A78@tscontrols.com> <8hiugm$2qa$1@counter.bik-gmbh.de> <393D3B85.ECCFC9EE@wanadoo.es> <8hl185$3jf$1@counter.bik-gmbh.de> mail-copies-to: never Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Complaints-To: newsmaster@eunet.no X-Trace: oslo-nntp.eunet.no 960371466 20771 195.0.192.66 (7 Jun 2000 09:51:06 GMT) Organization: Naggum Software; vox: +47 8800 8879; fax: +47 8800 8601; http://www.naggum.no User-Agent: Gnus/5.0803 (Gnus v5.8.3) Emacs/20.6 Mime-Version: 1.0 NNTP-Posting-Date: 7 Jun 2000 09:51:06 GMT Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp * Martin Cracauer | It doesn't have to be open-Source, just a Standard that is | implemented by more than one Vendor. Why isn't a publicly available specification sufficient? Why does it have to be implemented by more than one vendor? How do you bootstrap this process for new products/ideas? #:Erik -- If this is not what you expected, please alter your expectations.