From ... From: Erik Naggum Subject: Re: inhibiting GC Date: 1999/06/02 Message-ID: <3137344303247610@naggum.no>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 484998955 References: <3137280845702221@naggum.no> <877lpmoifv.fsf@pc-hrvoje.srce.hr> <3137330375665853@naggum.no> mail-copies-to: never Organization: Naggum Software; +47 8800 8879; http://www.naggum.no Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp * Erik Naggum | since he was asking about the Allegro CL scavenging garbage collector, I | thought it would be more instructive to answer in that context, but there | are of course other GC implementations around. Emacs', for instance, is | horribly, horribly in efficient, and Allegro CL's is very fast and also | very wasteful. cursed be editing without proper substructure navigation. that last sentence was intended to read: Emacs', for instance, is horribly, horribly inefficient and also very wasteful, and Allegro CL's is very fast. sigh. #:Erik -- @1999-07-22T00:37:33Z -- pi billion seconds since the turn of the century