From ... From: Erik Naggum Subject: Re: Java is really convenient. Re: Sun thinks about switching Java to S-expression syntax: Lava Date: 1999/02/16 Message-ID: <3128146248229145@naggum.no>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 444880484 References: <36C4A10F.164FC49F@IntelliMarket.Com> <7aattr$8e6@crl3.crl.com> <873e46hfyo.fsf_-_@2xtreme.net> mail-copies-to: never Organization: Naggum Software; +47 8800 8879; http://www.naggum.no Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp * cbarry@2xtreme.net (Christopher R. Barry) | * You can download a full, uncrippled Java implementation + IDE for | any major platform absolutely free, and in the case of the JDK even | get the source code. AFAIK you can only do this with the Unix | platform for Common Lisp. www.franz.com offers Allegro CL Lite to any stray comer. includes IDE. (but use LOAD-COMPILED instead of COMPILE-FILE and LOAD.) | * Swing, unlike CLIM, doesn't cost $4000-$7000 to even try out on Unix. none of the CLIM providers charge you money for trying it out before you decide to buy it or not. | I think every ounce of hype Java has recieved is deserved. ??? | As a language itself, I think it's better than C, C++, Eiffel, ADA, "Ada" is named after Ada Lovelace. it's a proper name, not an acronym. (I helped start the "Ada in Norway" user group in 1985. it's my "other" language, and my company logo still carries symbols from the Ada world. that people write ADA, like they write LISP, is a pet peeve.) | And Common Lisp sure can't compete with its real cost in most situations | (all things considered). I don't think you are a competent judge of that, _especially_ not the parenthetical remark. | It would be nice if Common Lisp could at least standardise some of the | networking, threads and i/o functionality you get in Java, and if it had | a standard, accessible and reasonably priced GUI toolkit. I'm still confused as to this standardization issue. yes, it would be nice if it were standardized, but why can't you use something today? Common Lisp is a standard _because_ it was used and gaining solid support for a number of really complex things. if people who do not understand how these things work refuse to use something _until_ it's standard, it will likely never become a standard, and if, against all odds, it should, you guys will complain and not use it, anyway. some of us prefer languages that don't change a lot, that aren't in the middle of the fight between good and evil, and on which long-term investments may actually be made with solid profit expectations. Common Lisp has a problem in that only mature people use it _after_ they have become disgusted with other languages and their hype. #:Erik