From ... From: Erik Naggum Subject: Re: superior(?) programming languages Date: 1996/12/21 Message-ID: <3060166789025726@naggum.no>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 205270402 distribution: inet references: <5536n3$90j@nanaimo.island.net> <58dfqa$95q@A-abe.resnet.ucsb.edu> <850477903snz@wildcard.demon.co.uk> <3059670197357211@naggum.no> <850768476snz@wildcard.demon.co.uk> <3059818967374075@naggum.no> <5973ij$55k1@lumen.brightware.com> <3059867157651487@naggum.no> organization: Naggum Software; +47 2295 0313; http://www.naggum.no newsgroups: comp.arch,comp.lang.lisp * Harley Davis | I've looked over the sources of Ilog Talk and I've found exactly the | following uses of eval: | | * Evaluate forms in the debugger. | * Evaluate forms in the top-level interactive loop. | * Evaluate forms when using the built-in test file system. | * Evaluate forms coming from Emacs. does that mean that Ilog Talk does not support read-time evaluation as in the sharp-dot reader macro? #\Erik -- "He didn't care." "They never do."