% -*- Mode: TeX -*-

% Character Comparison
% Character Types
% Character Roles
% Character Casification
% Character Codes
% Character Names

%-------------------- Character Types --------------------

%%% ========== CHARACTER (System Class)
\begincom{character}\ftype{System Class}

\label Class Precedence List::
\typeref{character},
\typeref{t}

\label Description::

A \term{character} is an \term{object} that 
represents a unitary token in an aggregate quantity of text;
\seesection\CharacterConcepts.

\issue{CHARACTER-VS-CHAR:LESS-INCONSISTENT-SHORT}
\issue{CHARACTER-PROPOSAL:2-3-1}
\Thetypes{base-char} and \typeref{extended-char}
form an \term{exhaustive partition} of \thetype{character}.
\endissue{CHARACTER-PROPOSAL:2-3-1}
\endissue{CHARACTER-VS-CHAR:LESS-INCONSISTENT-SHORT}

\label See Also::

{\secref\CharacterConcepts},
{\secref\SharpsignBackslash},
{\secref\PrintingCharacters}

\endcom%{character}\ftype{System Class}
\begincom{base-char}\ftype{Type}

\issue{CHARACTER-VS-CHAR:LESS-INCONSISTENT-SHORT}

\label Supertypes::

\typeref{base-char},
\typeref{character},
\typeref{t}

\label Description::

\Thetype{base-char} is defined as the \term{upgraded array element type} 
of \typeref{standard-char}.
An \term{implementation} can support additional \subtypesof{character}
(besides the ones listed in this standard) 
that might or might not be \supertypesof{base-char}.
In addition, an \term{implementation} can define \typeref{base-char}
to be the \term{same} \term{type} as \typeref{character}.
 
\term{Base characters} are distinguished in the following respects:
\beginlist
\itemitem{1.} \Thetype{standard-char} is a \term{subrepertoire} of \thetype{base-char}.
\itemitem{2.} The selection of \term{base characters} that are not \term{standard characters}
	      is implementation defined.
\itemitem{3.} Only \term{objects} of \thetype{base-char} can be 
	     \term{elements} of a \term{base string}.
\itemitem{4.}
No upper bound is specified for the number of characters in the 
\typeref{base-char} \term{repertoire}; the size of that \term{repertoire}
is %\term{implementation-dependent}
\term{implementation-defined}.
The lower bound is~96, the number of \term{standard characters}.
%defined for \clisp. 
\endlist
 
%The distinction of base characters is largely a pragmatic
%choice.  It permits efficient handling of common situations, may
%be privileged for host system I/O, and can serve as an
%intermediate basis for portability, less general than the standard
%characters, but possibly more useful across a narrower range of
%implementations.
% 
%Many computers have some "base" character representation which
%is a function of hardware instructions for dealing with characters,
%as well as the organization of the file system.  The base character
%representation is likely to be the smallest transaction unit permitted
%for text file and terminal I/O operations.  On a system with a record
%based I/O paradigm, the base character representation is likely to
%be the smallest record quantum.  On many computer systems,
%this representation is a byte.
 
Whether a character is a \term{base character} depends on the way 
that an \term{implementation} represents \term{strings}, 
and not any other properties of the \term{implementation} or the host operating system.  
For example, one implementation might encode all \term{strings} 
as characters having 16-bit encodings, and another might have
two kinds of \term{strings}: those with characters having 8-bit 
encodings and those with characters having 16-bit encodings.  In the
first \term{implementation}, \thetype{base-char} is equivalent to
\thetype{character}: there is only one kind of \term{string}.
In the second \term{implementation}, the \term{base characters} might be 
those \term{characters} that could be stored in a \term{string} of \term{characters}
having 8-bit encodings.  In such an implementation,
\thetype{base-char} is a \term{proper subtype} of \thetype{character}.
%KMP: Note that I think there could be implementations in which the 8-bit strings
%are -not- base characters, if all the standard-chars were not 
%representable using the 8-bit encoding scheme.  In such a case,
%it might be that (upgraded-array-element-type 'standard-char) returned
%the 16-bit representation.  It might be that the 8-bit representation
%was something else entirely.
 
%% 2.15.0 15              
\Thetype{standard-char} is a 
\issue{CHARACTER-PROPOSAL:2-3-1}
\subtypeof{base-char}.
%This text will be deleted:
%subtype of \typeref{character}.
\endissue{CHARACTER-PROPOSAL:2-3-1}
%\thetype{string-char} is a \subtypeof{character}.

\endissue{CHARACTER-VS-CHAR:LESS-INCONSISTENT-SHORT}

\endcom%{base-char}\ftype{Type}
\begincom{standard-char}\ftype{Type}

\issue{STANDARD-REPERTOIRE-GRATUITOUS:RENAME}

\label Supertypes::

\typeref{standard-char},
\issue{CHARACTER-VS-CHAR:LESS-INCONSISTENT-SHORT}
\typeref{base-char},
\endissue{CHARACTER-VS-CHAR:LESS-INCONSISTENT-SHORT}
\typeref{character},
\typeref{t}

\label Description::

A fixed set of 96 \term{characters} required to be present in all 
\term{conforming implementations}.  \term{Standard characters} are 
defined in \secref\StandardChars.

%%% 13.2.0 4

\issue{CHARACTER-PROPOSAL:2-1-1}
Any \term{character} that is not \term{simple} is not a \term{standard character}.
\endissue{CHARACTER-PROPOSAL:2-1-1}

\endissue{STANDARD-REPERTOIRE-GRATUITOUS:RENAME}

\label See Also::

{\secref\StandardChars}

\endcom%{standard-char}\ftype{Type}
\begincom{extended-char}\ftype{Type}

\issue{CHARACTER-PROPOSAL:2-3-1}
\issue{CHARACTER-VS-CHAR:LESS-INCONSISTENT-SHORT}

\label Supertypes::

\typeref{extended-char},
\typeref{character},
\typeref{t}

\label Description::

\Thetype{extended-char} is equivalent to the \term{type} \f{(and character (not base-char))}.

%% 2.3.0 1
%% 2.3.0 2

\label Notes::

%This next paragraph as added per Barrett's suggestion:
\Thetype{extended-char} might 
%be equivalent to \thetype{nil}
%% Replaced as controversial. -kmp 4-Feb-92
have no \term{elements}\meaning{4}
in \term{implementations} in which all \term{characters} are \oftype{base-char}.

\endissue{CHARACTER-VS-CHAR:LESS-INCONSISTENT-SHORT}
\endissue{CHARACTER-PROPOSAL:2-3-1}

\endcom%{extended-char}\ftype{Type}


%-------------------- Character Comparison --------------------

%%% ========== CHAR-EQUAL
%%% ========== CHAR-NOT-EQUAL
%%% ========== CHAR-LESSP
%%% ========== CHAR-GREATERP
%%% ========== CHAR-NOT-LESSP
%%% ========== CHAR-NOT-GREATERP
%%% ========== CHAR=
%%% ========== CHAR/=
%%% ========== CHAR<
%%% ========== CHAR>
%%% ========== CHAR>=
%%% ========== CHAR<=
\begincom{char=, char/=, char<, char>, char<=, char>=, 
          char-equal, char-not-equal, char-lessp, char-greaterp, char-not-greaterp,
          char-not-lessp}\ftype{Function}

\label Syntax::

\DefunMultiWithValues {{\rest} \plus{characters}}
		      {generalized-boolean}
{\entry{{char$=$}}
 \entry{{char$/=$}}
 \entry{{char$<$}}
 \entry{{char$>$}}
 \entry{{char$<=$}}
 \entry{{char$>=$}}
 \noalign{\vskip 5pt}
 \entry{char-equal}
 \entry{char-not-equal}
 \entry{char-lessp}
 \entry{char-greaterp}
 \entry{char-not-greaterp}
 \entry{char-not-lessp}}

\label Arguments and Values::

\param{character}---a \term{character}.

\param{generalized-boolean}---a \term{generalized boolean}.
                         
\label Description::

These predicates compare \term{characters}.

\funref{char=} returns \term{true} if all \param{characters} are the \term{same};
otherwise, it returns \term{false}.
\issue{CHARACTER-PROPOSAL:2-1-1}
If two \param{characters} differ 
in any \term{implementation-defined} \term{attributes},
then they are not \funref{char=}.
\endissue{CHARACTER-PROPOSAL:2-1-1}

\funref{char/=} returns \term{true} if all \param{characters} are different;
otherwise, it returns \term{false}.

\funref{char<} returns \term{true} if the \param{characters} are monotonically increasing; 
otherwise, it returns \term{false}.
\issue{CHARACTER-PROPOSAL:2-1-1}
If two \term{characters} 
have \term{identical} \term{implementation-defined} \term{attributes}, 
then their ordering by \funref{char<} is 
consistent with the numerical ordering by the predicate \f{<} on their \term{codes}.
\endissue{CHARACTER-PROPOSAL:2-1-1}

\funref{char>} returns \term{true} if the \param{characters} are monotonically decreasing; 
otherwise, it returns \term{false}.
\issue{CHARACTER-PROPOSAL:2-1-1}
If two \term{characters} have 
\term{identical} \term{implementation-defined} \term{attributes},
then their ordering by \funref{char>} is 
consistent with the numerical ordering by the predicate \f{>} on their \term{codes}. 
\endissue{CHARACTER-PROPOSAL:2-1-1}

\funref{char<=} returns \term{true} 
if the \param{characters} are monotonically nondecreasing; 
otherwise, it returns \term{false}.
\issue{CHARACTER-PROPOSAL:2-1-1}
If two \term{characters} have
\term{identical} \term{implementation-defined} \term{attributes},
then their ordering by \funref{char<=} is
consistent with the numerical ordering by the predicate \f{<=} on their \term{codes}. 
\endissue{CHARACTER-PROPOSAL:2-1-1}
                               
\funref{char>=} returns \term{true} 
if the \param{characters} are monotonically nonincreasing; 
otherwise, it returns \term{false}.
\issue{CHARACTER-PROPOSAL:2-1-1}
If two \term{characters} have
\term{identical} \term{implementation-defined} \term{attributes},
then their ordering by \funref{char>=} is 
consistent with the numerical ordering by the predicate \f{>=} on their \term{codes}. 
\endissue{CHARACTER-PROPOSAL:2-1-1}

    \funref{char-equal},
    \funref{char-not-equal},
    \funref{char-lessp},
    \funref{char-greaterp},
    \funref{char-not-greaterp},
and \funref{char-not-lessp}
are similar to 
    \funref{char=},
    \funref{char/=},
    \funref{char<},
    \funref{char>},
    \funref{char<=},
    \funref{char>=},
respectively,
except that they ignore differences in \term{case} and
\issue{CHARACTER-PROPOSAL:2-1-1}
% that the effect, if any, of each \term{implementation-defined} \term{attribute} 
% must be specified as part of the definition of that \term{attribute}.
%% Sandra thought the above was awkward. Trying again. -kmp 26-Jan-92
might have an \term{implementation-defined} behavior 
for \term{non-simple} \term{characters}.
% For example, an implementation might define that certain 
% \term{implementation-defined} \term{attributes} are ignored by
% \funref{char-equal}, \i{etc.}
%% More rewording to soothe awkwardness. -kmp 26-Jan-92
For example, an \term{implementation} might define that 
\funref{char-equal}, \i{etc.} ignore certain 
\term{implementation-defined} \term{attributes}.
The effect, if any, 
of each \term{implementation-defined} \term{attribute}
upon these functions must be specified as part of the definition of that \term{attribute}.
%% This part has been moved to the notes.
% %% 13.2.0 char-equal
% This means that for the \term{standard characters}, the ordering used by
% \funref{char-equal}, \etc. is such that
% \f{A=a}, \f{B=b}, and so on, up to \f{Z=z}, and furthermore either
% \f{9<A} or \f{Z<0}.
\endissue{CHARACTER-PROPOSAL:2-1-1}

%% 13.2.0 31

\label Examples::

\issue{CHARACTER-PROPOSAL:2-1-1}
\code
 (char= #\\d #\\d) \EV \term{true}
 (char= #\\A #\\a) \EV \term{false}
 (char= #\\d #\\x) \EV \term{false}
 (char= #\\d #\\D) \EV \term{false}
 (char/= #\\d #\\d) \EV \term{false}
 (char/= #\\d #\\x) \EV \term{true}
 (char/= #\\d #\\D) \EV \term{true}
 (char= #\\d #\\d #\\d #\\d) \EV \term{true}
 (char/= #\\d #\\d #\\d #\\d) \EV \term{false}
 (char= #\\d #\\d #\\x #\\d) \EV \term{false}
 (char/= #\\d #\\d #\\x #\\d) \EV \term{false}
 (char= #\\d #\\y #\\x #\\c) \EV \term{false}
 (char/= #\\d #\\y #\\x #\\c) \EV \term{true}
 (char= #\\d #\\c #\\d) \EV \term{false}
 (char/= #\\d #\\c #\\d) \EV \term{false}
 (char< #\\d #\\x) \EV \term{true}
 (char<= #\\d #\\x) \EV \term{true}
 (char< #\\d #\\d) \EV \term{false}
 (char<= #\\d #\\d) \EV \term{true}
 (char< #\\a #\\e #\\y #\\z) \EV \term{true}
 (char<= #\\a #\\e #\\y #\\z) \EV \term{true}
 (char< #\\a #\\e #\\e #\\y) \EV \term{false}
 (char<= #\\a #\\e #\\e #\\y) \EV \term{true}
 (char> #\\e #\\d) \EV \term{true}
 (char>= #\\e #\\d) \EV \term{true}
 (char> #\\d #\\c #\\b #\\a) \EV \term{true}
 (char>= #\\d #\\c #\\b #\\a) \EV \term{true}
 (char> #\\d #\\d #\\c #\\a) \EV \term{false}
 (char>= #\\d #\\d #\\c #\\a) \EV \term{true}
 (char> #\\e #\\d #\\b #\\c #\\a) \EV \term{false}
 (char>= #\\e #\\d #\\b #\\c #\\a) \EV \term{false}
 (char> #\\z #\\A) \EV \term{implementation-dependent}
 (char> #\\Z #\\a) \EV \term{implementation-dependent}
 (char-equal #\\A #\\a) \EV \term{true}
 (stable-sort (list #\\b #\\A #\\B #\\a #\\c #\\C) #'char-lessp)
\EV (#\\A #\\a #\\b #\\B #\\c #\\C)
 (stable-sort (list #\\b #\\A #\\B #\\a #\\c #\\C) #'char<)
\EV (#\\A #\\B #\\C #\\a #\\b #\\c) ;Implementation A
\EV (#\\a #\\b #\\c #\\A #\\B #\\C) ;Implementation B
\EV (#\\a #\\A #\\b #\\B #\\c #\\C) ;Implementation C
\EV (#\\A #\\a #\\B #\\b #\\C #\\c) ;Implementation D
\EV (#\\A #\\B #\\a #\\b #\\C #\\c) ;Implementation E
\endcode
%GLS observes that there are 15 other possibilities here:
% (#\\A #\\a #\\b #\\c #\\B #\\C)
% (#\\A #\\B #\\a #\\b #\\c #\\C)
% (#\\a #\\A #\\b #\\B #\\C #\\c)
% (#\\a #\\A #\\B #\\b #\\C #\\c)
% (#\\a #\\A #\\b #\\c #\\B #\\C)
% (#\\a #\\A #\\B #\\b #\\c #\\C)
% (#\\a #\\A #\\B #\\C #\\b #\\c)
% (#\\A #\\a #\\B #\\b #\\c #\\C)
% (#\\A #\\a #\\B #\\C #\\b #\\c)
% (#\\A #\\B #\\a #\\C #\\b #\\c)
% (#\\a #\\b #\\A #\\c #\\B #\\C)
% (#\\a #\\b #\\A #\\B #\\c #\\C)
% (#\\a #\\b #\\A #\\B #\\C #\\c)
% (#\\A #\\a #\\b #\\B #\\c #\\C)
% (#\\A #\\a #\\b #\\B #\\C #\\c)
%But I think readers will get the idea from those I've specified. -kmp 27-May-91
\endissue{CHARACTER-PROPOSAL:2-1-1}

\label Affected By:\None.

\label Exceptional Situations::

\Shouldcheckplus{character}

\label See Also::

{\secref\CharacterSyntax},
{\secref\ImplementationDefinedScripts}

\label Notes::

If characters differ in their \term{code} \term{attribute} 
or any \term{implementation-defined} \term{attribute},
they are considered to be different by \funref{char=}.

%% 13.2.0 33
There is no requirement that \f{(eq c1 c2)} be true merely because
\f{(char= c1 c2)} is \term{true}.  While \funref{eq} can distinguish two 
\term{characters}
that \funref{char=} does not, it is distinguishing them not
as \term{characters}, but in some sense on the basis of a lower level
implementation characteristic.
If \f{(eq c1 c2)} is \term{true},
then \f{(char= c1 c2)} is also true.
\funref{eql} and \funref{equal}
compare \term{characters} in the same
way that \funref{char=} does.

The manner in which \term{case} is used by 
     \funref{char-equal},
     \funref{char-not-equal},
     \funref{char-lessp},
     \funref{char-greaterp},
     \funref{char-not-greaterp},
 and \funref{char-not-lessp}
implies an ordering for \term{standard characters} such that
\f{A=a}, \f{B=b}, and so on, up to \f{Z=z}, and furthermore either
\f{9<A} or \f{Z<0}.

\endcom

%-------------------- Character Types --------------------

%%% ========== CHARACTER (Function)
\begincom{character}\ftype{Function}

\label Syntax::

\DefunWithValues character {character} {denoted-character}

\label Arguments and Values:: 

\issue{CHARACTER-PROPOSAL:2-1-1}
\param{character}---a \term{character designator}.
\endissue{CHARACTER-PROPOSAL:2-1-1}

\param{denoted-character}---a \term{character}.

\label Description::

%% 13.4.0 3
Returns the \term{character} denoted by the \param{character} \term{designator}.

\label Examples::

\code
 (character #\\a) \EV #\\a
 (character "a") \EV #\\a
 (character 'a) \EV #\\A
 (character '\\a) \EV #\\a
 (character 65.) is an error.
 (character 'apple) is an error.
\endcode

\label Affected By:\None.

\label Exceptional Situations::

\Shouldchecktype{object}{a \term{character designator}}

\label See Also::

\funref{coerce}

\label Notes::

\code
 (character \param{object}) \EQ (coerce \param{object} 'character)
\endcode

\endcom

%%% ========== CHARACTERP
\begincom{characterp}\ftype{Function}

\label Syntax::

\DefunWithValues characterp {object} {generalized-boolean}

\label Arguments and Values::

\param{object}---an \term{object}.

\param{generalized-boolean}---a \term{generalized boolean}.

\label Description::

%% 6.2.2 17
\TypePredicate{object}{character}

\label Examples::                  

\code
 (characterp #\\a) \EV \term{true}
 (characterp 'a) \EV \term{false}
 (characterp "a") \EV \term{false}
 (characterp 65.) \EV \term{false}
 (characterp #\\Newline) \EV \term{true}
 ;; This next example presupposes an implementation 
 ;; in which #\\Rubout is an implementation-defined character.
 (characterp #\\Rubout) \EV \term{true}
\endcode

\label Affected By:\None.

\label Exceptional Situations:\None!

\label See Also::

\funref{character} (\term{type} and \term{function}), \funref{typep}

\label Notes::

\code
 (characterp \param{object}) \EQ (typep \param{object} 'character)
\endcode

\endcom

%-------------------- Character Roles --------------------

%%% ========== ALPHA-CHAR-P
\begincom{alpha-char-p}\ftype{Function}

\label Syntax::

\DefunWithValues alpha-char-p {character} {generalized-boolean}

\label Arguments and Values::

\param{character}---a \term{character}.

\param{generalized-boolean}---a \term{generalized boolean}.

\label Description::

%% 13.2.0 9
\Predicate{character}{an \term{alphabetic}\meaning{1} \term{character}}

\label Examples::

\def\alfa{$\alpha$}
\code
 (alpha-char-p #\\a) \EV \term{true}
 (alpha-char-p #\\5) \EV \term{false}
 (alpha-char-p #\\Newline) \EV \term{false}
 ;; This next example presupposes an implementation
 ;; in which #\\\alfa is a defined character.
 (alpha-char-p #\\\alfa) \EV \term{implementation-dependent}
\endcode

\label Affected By::

None.
(In particular, the results of this predicate are independent 
of any special syntax which might have been enabled in the \term{current readtable}.)

\label Exceptional Situations::

\Shouldchecktype{character}{a \term{character}}

\label See Also::

\funref{alphanumericp},
{\secref\ImplementationDefinedScripts}

\label Notes:\None.

\endcom

%%% ========== ALPHANUMERICP
\begincom{alphanumericp}\ftype{Function}

\label Syntax::

\DefunWithValues alphanumericp {character} {generalized-boolean}

\label Arguments and Values:: 

\param{character}---a \term{character}.

\param{generalized-boolean}---a \term{generalized boolean}.

\label Description::

%% 13.2.0 22
\Predicate{character}{an \term{alphabetic}\meaning{1} \term{character} 
		   or a  \term{numeric}    \term{character}}

\label Examples::

\code
 (alphanumericp #\\Z) \EV \term{true}
 (alphanumericp #\\9) \EV \term{true}
 (alphanumericp #\\Newline) \EV \term{false}
 (alphanumericp #\\#) \EV \term{false}
\endcode

\label Affected By::

None.
(In particular, the results of this predicate are independent 
of any special syntax which might have been enabled in the \term{current readtable}.)

\label Exceptional Situations::

\Shouldchecktype{character}{a \term{character}}

\label See Also::

\funref{alpha-char-p}, \funref{graphic-char-p}, \funref{digit-char-p}

\label Notes::

Alphanumeric characters are graphic
as defined by \funref{graphic-char-p}.
The alphanumeric characters are a subset of the graphic characters.
%The bits \term{attribute} of any alphanumeric character is 0.
%% 13.2.0 24
The standard characters \f{A} through \f{Z},
		        \f{a} through \f{z},
		    and \f{0} through \f{9} are alphanumeric characters.

\code
 (alphanumericp x)
   \EQ (or (alpha-char-p x) (not (null (digit-char-p x))))
\endcode
\endcom

%%% ========== DIGIT-CHAR
\begincom{digit-char}\ftype{Function}

\issue{CHARACTER-PROPOSAL:2-1-1}

%% 13.4.0 7
\label Syntax::

\DefunWithValues digit-char {weight {\opt} radix} {char}

\label Arguments and Values::

\param{weight}---a non-negative \term{integer}.

\param{radix}---a \term{radix}.
 \Default{\f{10}}

\param{char}---a \term{character} or \term{false}.

\label Description::   

%% 13.4.0 8
%% 13.4.0 9
%% 13.4.0 10

% I reorganized this description in a major way because once bits 
% were removed, it seemed to have a simpler description. -kmp 23-Apr-91

If \param{weight} is less than \param{radix},
\funref{digit-char} returns a \term{character} which has that \param{weight}
when considered as a digit in the specified radix.
If the resulting \term{character} is to be an \term{alphabetic}\meaning{1} \term{character},
it will be an uppercase \term{character}.

If \param{weight} is greater than or equal to \param{radix},
\funref{digit-char} returns \term{false}.


\label Examples::

\code
 (digit-char 0) \EV #\\0
 (digit-char 10 11) \EV #\\A
 (digit-char 10 10) \EV \term{false}
 (digit-char 7) \EV #\\7
 (digit-char 12) \EV \term{false}
 (digit-char 12 16) \EV #\\C  ;not #\\c
 (digit-char 6 2) \EV \term{false}
 (digit-char 1 2) \EV #\\1
\endcode

\label Affected By:\None.

\label Exceptional Situations:\None.

\label See Also::

\funref{digit-char-p},
\funref{graphic-char-p},
{\secref\CharacterSyntax}

\label Notes::

\endissue{CHARACTER-PROPOSAL:2-1-1}

\endcom

%%% ========== DIGIT-CHAR-P
\begincom{digit-char-p}\ftype{Function}

%% 13.2.0 18
\label Syntax::

\DefunWithValues digit-char-p {char {\opt} radix} {weight}

\label Arguments and Values::

\param{char}---a \term{character}.

\param{radix}---a \term{radix}.
 \Default{\f{10}}

\param{weight}---either a non-negative \term{integer} less than \param{radix}, 
		 or \term{false}.

\label Description::

Tests whether \param{char} is a digit in the specified \param{radix}
%% 13.2.0 20
(\ie with a weight less than \param{radix}).
If it is a digit in that \param{radix},
its weight is returned as an \term{integer}; 
otherwise \nil\ is returned.
                          
\label Examples::

\code
 (digit-char-p #\\5)    \EV 5
 (digit-char-p #\\5 2)  \EV \term{false}
 (digit-char-p #\\A)    \EV \term{false}
 (digit-char-p #\\a)    \EV \term{false}
 (digit-char-p #\\A 11) \EV 10
 (digit-char-p #\\a 11) \EV 10
 (mapcar #'(lambda (radix) 
             (map 'list #'(lambda (x) (digit-char-p x radix)) 
                  "059AaFGZ"))
         '(2 8 10 16 36))
 \EV ((0 NIL NIL NIL NIL NIL NIL NIL)
     (0 5 NIL NIL NIL NIL NIL NIL)
     (0 5 9 NIL NIL NIL NIL NIL)
     (0 5 9 10 10 15 NIL NIL)
     (0 5 9 10 10 15 16 35))
\endcode
%In the above, recall that \EV's arrow takes up about two column positions,
%rather than three characters "\EV" -- so the grinding looks funny here in
%the source, but better on paper.

\label Affected By::

None.
(In particular, the results of this predicate are independent 
of any special syntax which might have been enabled in the \term{current readtable}.)

\label Exceptional Situations:\None.

\label See Also::

\funref{alphanumericp}

\label Notes::

%% 13.2.0 19                   
Digits are \term{graphic} \term{characters}.

\endcom

%%% ========== GRAPHIC-CHAR-P
\begincom{graphic-char-p}\ftype{Function}

\label Syntax::

\DefunWithValues graphic-char-p {char} {generalized-boolean}

\label Arguments and Values::

\param{char}---a \term{character}.

\param{generalized-boolean}---a \term{generalized boolean}.

\label Description::

%% 13.2.0 5
\Predicate{character}{a \term{graphic} \term{character}}

\label Examples::                   

\code
 (graphic-char-p #\\G) \EV \term{true}
 (graphic-char-p #\\#) \EV \term{true}
 (graphic-char-p #\\Space) \EV \term{true}
 (graphic-char-p #\\Newline) \EV \term{false}
\endcode

\label Affected By:\None.

\label Exceptional Situations::

\Shouldchecktype{character}{a \term{character}}

\label See Also::

\funref{read},
{\secref\CharacterSyntax},
{\secref\ImplementationDefinedScripts}

\label Notes:\None.

\endcom

%%% ========== STANDARD-CHAR-P
\begincom{standard-char-p}\ftype{Function}

\label Syntax::

\DefunWithValues standard-char-p {character} {generalized-boolean}

\label Arguments and Values::

\param{character}---a \term{character}.

\param{generalized-boolean}---a \term{generalized boolean}.

\label Description::

%% 13.2.0 3
\TypePredicate{character}{standard-char}

\label Examples::                

\code
 (standard-char-p #\\Space) \EV \term{true}
 (standard-char-p #\\~) \EV \term{true}
 ;; This next example presupposes an implementation
 ;; in which #\\Bell is a defined character.
 (standard-char-p #\\Bell) \EV \term{false}
\endcode

\label Affected By:\None.

\label Exceptional Situations::

\Shouldchecktype{character}{a \term{character}}

\label See Also:\None.

\label Notes:\None.

\endcom

%-------------------- Character Casification --------------------

%%% ========== CHAR-DOWNCASE
%%% ========== CHAR-UPCASE
\begincom{char-upcase, char-downcase}\ftype{Function}

\label Syntax::

\DefunMultiWithValues {character} {corresponding-character} 
   {\entry{char-upcase}
    \entry{char-downcase}}

\label Arguments and Values:: 

\param{character}, \param{corresponding-character}---a \term{character}.

\label Description::

%% 13.4.0 5

If \param{character} is a \term{lowercase} \term{character},
\funref{char-upcase} returns the corresponding \term{uppercase} \term{character}.
Otherwise, \funref{char-upcase} just returns the given \param{character}.

If \param{character} is an \term{uppercase} \term{character},
\funref{char-downcase} returns the corresponding \term{lowercase} \term{character}.
Otherwise, \funref{char-downcase} just returns the given \param{character}.

\issue{CHARACTER-PROPOSAL:2-1-1}
The result only ever differs from \param{character} 
in its \term{code} \term{attribute};
all \term{implementation-defined} \term{attributes} are preserved.
\endissue{CHARACTER-PROPOSAL:2-1-1}

\label Examples::

\code
 (char-upcase #\\a) \EV #\\A
 (char-upcase #\\A) \EV #\\A
 (char-downcase #\\a) \EV #\\a
 (char-downcase #\\A) \EV #\\a
 (char-upcase #\\9) \EV #\\9
 (char-downcase #\\9) \EV #\\9
 (char-upcase #\\@) \EV #\\@
 (char-downcase #\\@) \EV #\\@
 ;; Note that this next example might run for a very long time in 
 ;; some implementations if CHAR-CODE-LIMIT happens to be very large
 ;; for that implementation.
 (dotimes (code char-code-limit)
   (let ((char (code-char code)))
     (when char
       (unless (cond ((upper-case-p char) (char= (char-upcase (char-downcase char)) char))
                     ((lower-case-p char) (char= (char-downcase (char-upcase char)) char))
                     (t (and (char= (char-upcase (char-downcase char)) char)
                             (char= (char-downcase (char-upcase char)) char))))
         (return char)))))
\EV NIL
\endcode

\label Affected By:\None.

\label Exceptional Situations::

\Shouldchecktype{character}{a \term{character}}

\label See Also::

\funref{upper-case-p},
\funref{alpha-char-p},
{\secref\CharactersWithCase},
{\secref\ImplementationDefinedScripts}

\label Notes::

If the \param{corresponding-char} is \term{different} than \param{character},
then both the \param{character} and the \param{corresponding-char} have \term{case}.

Since \funref{char-equal} ignores the \term{case} of the \term{characters} it compares,
the \param{corresponding-character} is always the \term{same} as \param{character}
under \funref{char-equal}.

\endcom

%%% ========== LOWER-CASE-P
%%% ========== BOTH-CASE-P
%%% ========== UPPER-CASE-P
\begincom{upper-case-p, lower-case-p, both-case-p}\ftype{Function}

\label Syntax::

\DefunMultiWithValues {character} {generalized-boolean}
  {\entry{upper-case-p}
   \entry{lower-case-p}
   \entry{both-case-p}}

\label Arguments and Values::

\param{character}---a \term{character}.

\param{generalized-boolean}---a \term{generalized boolean}.

\label Description::

These functions test the case of a given \param{character}.

%% 13.2.0 13
\NamedPredicate{upper-case-p}{character}{an \term{uppercase} \term{character}}

%% 13.2.0 14
\NamedPredicate{lower-case-p}{character}{a \term{lowercase} \term{character}}

%% 13.2.0 15
\NamedPredicate{both-case-p}{character}{a \term{character} with \term{case}}

\label Examples::

\code
 (upper-case-p #\\A) \EV \term{true}
 (upper-case-p #\\a) \EV \term{false}
 (both-case-p #\\a) \EV \term{true}
 (both-case-p #\\5) \EV \term{false}
 (lower-case-p #\\5) \EV \term{false}
 (upper-case-p #\\5) \EV \term{false}
 ;; This next example presupposes an implementation 
 ;; in which #\\Bell is an implementation-defined character.
 (lower-case-p #\\Bell) \EV \term{false}
\endcode

\label Side Effects:\None.

\label Affected By:\None.

\label Exceptional Situations::

\Shouldchecktype{character}{a \term{character}}

\label See Also::

\funref{char-upcase},
\funref{char-downcase},
{\secref\CharactersWithCase},
{\secref\ImplementationDefinedScripts}

\label Notes:\None.

\endcom

%-------------------- Character Codes --------------------

%%% ========== CHAR-CODE
\begincom{char-code}\ftype{Function}

\label Syntax::

\DefunWithValues char-code {character} {code}

\label Arguments and Values:: 

\param{character}---a \term{character}.

\param{code}---a \term{character code}.

\label Description::

%% 13.3.0 3
\funref{char-code} returns the \term{code} \term{attribute} of \param{character}.

\label Examples::

\code
;; An implementation using ASCII character encoding 
;; might return these values:
(char-code #\\$) \EV 36
(char-code #\\a) \EV 97
\endcode

\label Affected By:\None.

\label Exceptional Situations::

\Shouldchecktype{character}{a \term{character}}

\label See Also::
                          
\funref{char-code-limit}

\label Notes:\None.

\endcom

%%% ========== CHAR-INT
\begincom{char-int}\ftype{Function}

\label Syntax::

\DefunWithValues char-int {character} {integer}

\label Arguments and Values:: 

\param{character}---a \term{character}.

\param{integer}---a non-negative \term{integer}.

\label Description::

%% 13.4.0 11
\issue{CHARACTER-PROPOSAL:2-1-2}
Returns a non-negative \term{integer} encoding the \param{character} object.
The manner in which the \term{integer} is computed is \term{implementation-dependent}.
In contrast to \funref{sxhash}, the result is not guaranteed to be independent 
of the particular \term{Lisp image}.
\endissue{CHARACTER-PROPOSAL:2-1-2}

%% 13.4.0 12
If \param{character} has no \term{implementation-defined} \term{attributes},
the results of \funref{char-int} and \funref{char-code} are the same. 

\code
 (char= \i{c1} \i{c2}) \EQ (= (char-int \i{c1}) (char-int \i{c2}))
\endcode
for characters \i{c1} and \i{c2}.

\label Examples::

\code
 (char-int #\\A) \EV 65       ; implementation A
 (char-int #\\A) \EV 577      ; implementation B
 (char-int #\\A) \EV 262145   ; implementation C
\endcode

\label Affected By:\None.

\label Exceptional Situations:\None.

\label See Also::

\funref{char-code}

\label Notes:\None.

\endcom

%%% ========== CODE-CHAR
\begincom{code-char}\ftype{Function}

\issue{CHARACTER-PROPOSAL:2-1-1}

\label Syntax::

\DefunWithValues code-char {code} {char-p}

\label Arguments and Values::

\param{code}---a \term{character code}.

\param{char-p}---a \term{character} or \nil.

\label Description::

%% 13.3.0 6
Returns a \term{character} with the \term{code} \term{attribute} given by \param{code}.
If no such \term{character} exists and one cannot be created, \nil\ is returned.

\label Examples::

\code
(code-char 65.) \EV #\\A  ;in an implementation using ASCII codes
(code-char (char-code #\\Space)) \EV #\\Space  ;in any implementation
\endcode

%% 13.3.0 7
% Removed per suggestion of Barmar -- used old-style bits/fonts.

\label Affected By::

The \term{implementation}'s character encoding.

\label Exceptional Situations:\None.

\label See Also::

\funref{char-code}

\label Notes::

\endissue{CHARACTER-PROPOSAL:2-1-1}

\endcom

%%% ========== CHAR-CODE-LIMIT
\begincom{char-code-limit}\ftype{Constant Variable}

\label Constant Value::

A non-negative \term{integer}, the exact magnitude of which
is \term{implementation-dependent}, but which is not less
than \f{96} (the number of \term{standard characters}).

\label Description::

%% 13.1.0 2
The upper exclusive bound on the \term{value} returned by 
the \term{function} \funref{char-code}.

\label See Also::

\funref{char-code}

\label Notes::

% Sandra wanted this added.
\Thevalueof{char-code-limit} might be larger than the actual
number of \term{characters} supported by the \term{implementation}.

\endcom

%-------------------- Character Names --------------------

%%% ========== CHAR-NAME
\begincom{char-name}\ftype{Function}

\label Syntax::

\DefunWithValues char-name {character} {name}

\label Arguments and Values::

\param{character}---a \term{character}.

\param{name}---a \term{string} or \nil.

\label Description::

Returns a \term{string} that is the \term{name} of the \param{character},
or \nil\ if the \param{character} has no \term{name}.

%% 13.4.0 20
% \funref{char-name} will only locate ``simple'' character names;
% it will not construct names on the basis of
% the \param{character}'s \term{implementation-dependent} \term{attributes}.

All \term{non-graphic} characters are required to have \term{names}
unless they have some \term{implementation-defined} \term{attribute}
which is not \term{null}.  Whether or not other \term{characters}
have \term{names} is \term{implementation-dependent}.

\issue{CHAR-NAME-CASE:X3J13-MAR-91}
%% I added this next phrase to highlight why there are two lists here. -kmp 14-May-93
The \term{standard characters}
\NewlineChar\ and \SpaceChar\ have the respective names \f{"Newline"} and \f{"Space"}.
%% Ditto. -kmp 14-May-93
The \term{semi-standard} \term{characters}
\TabChar, \PageChar, \RuboutChar, \LinefeedChar, \ReturnChar, and \BackspaceChar\ 
%% Next parenthetical remark added for emphasis. -kmp 14-May-93
(if they are supported by the \term{implementation})
have the respective names
\f{"Tab"},  \f{"Page"},  \f{"Rubout"},  \f{"Linefeed"},  \f{"Return"}, and \f{"Backspace"}
(in the indicated case, even though name lookup by ``\f{\#\\}'' 
and by \thefunction{name-char} is not case sensitive).
\endissue{CHAR-NAME-CASE:X3J13-MAR-91}

\label Examples::

\code
 (char-name #\\ ) \EV "Space"
 (char-name #\\Space) \EV "Space"
 (char-name #\\Page) \EV "Page"

 (char-name #\\a)
\EV NIL
\OV "LOWERCASE-a"
\OV "Small-A"
\OV "LA01"

 (char-name #\\A)
\EV NIL
\OV "UPPERCASE-A"
\OV "Capital-A"
\OV "LA02"

 ;; Even though its CHAR-NAME can vary, #\\A prints as #\\A
 (prin1-to-string (read-from-string (format nil "#\\\\~A" (or (char-name #\\A) "A"))))
\EV "#\\\\A"
\endcode

\label Affected By:\None.

\label Exceptional Situations::

\Shouldchecktype{character}{a \term{character}}

\label See Also::

\funref{name-char},
{\secref\PrintingCharacters}

\label Notes::

%% Added "non-graphic" to cover objection by Sandra:
%%  Does this mean that if (char-name #\A) = "Capital-A"
%%   (print #\A) prints
%%   #\Capital-A
%%  instead of #\A ???
%%  Or does this apply only to non-standard characters.
\term{Non-graphic} 
\term{characters} having \term{names} are written by the \term{Lisp printer}
as ``\f{\#\\}'' followed by the their \term{name}; \seesection\PrintingCharacters.

\endcom

%%% ========== NAME-CHAR
\begincom{name-char}\ftype{Function}

\label Syntax::

\DefunWithValues name-char {name} {char-p}

\label Arguments and Values::

%% 13.4.0 17
%% 13.4.0 18
\param{name}---a \term{string designator}.

\param{char-p}---a \term{character} or \nil.

\label Description::

%% 13.4.0 21                          
Returns the \term{character} \term{object} whose \term{name} is
\param{name} (as determined by \funref{string-equal}---\ie lookup is not case sensitive).
If such a \term{character} does not exist, \nil\ is returned.

\label Examples::

\code
(name-char 'space) \EV #\\Space
(name-char "space") \EV #\\Space
(name-char "Space") \EV #\\Space
(let ((x (char-name #\\a)))
  (or (not x) (eql (name-char x) #\\a))) \EV \term{true}
\endcode

\label Affected By:\None.

\label Exceptional Situations::

\Shouldchecktype{name}{a \term{string designator}}

\label See Also::

\funref{char-name}

\label Notes:\None.

\endcom